ours. Reports and rumors of corruption further aggravate an already difficult situation. Theres no other form of voting in a democratic election that gives as accurate an indication of what an entire country is thinking politically. Chief among these is the relatively weak representation of the views and circumstances of lower-middle-class and poor Americans in the nations politics. What It Means To Be an American. America was formed on the idea that religion and speech should not be controlled by the government. Australians, like Americans, are not always the informed voters and engaged citizens they should. If every eligible adult were required to vote, states would have little choice but to overhaul their electoral systems and make voting as accessible as possible. Here in the United States, we are truly blessed with so much. Therefore, cheering for the underdog is nothing new to Americans.
Should Sixteen Year Old be able to, vote?
As such, the American people are afforded an objective perspective of their governments activities. This view has more than just a ring of truth. And, if democracy is a public good from which citizens benefit, there should be a reciprocal duty for citizens to participate in its function. I cant name one person I know who has been levied the standard 20 fine for not voting. Australia is no political paradise. Every official has first and foremost his own interest and self-advancement in mind. We can speak our minds about a certain injustice or write about controversial things that many people deem unconstitutional or politically incorrect. Compulsory voting creates culture and expectations. This is especially true when a state is particularly opposed to the campaign issues of a candidate. As electoral seats are apportioned according to population, smaller states (with their few electoral votes) therefore have lesser influence and could be effectively ignored by a candidate.
The second amendment to the constitution, passed in 1791 along with the rest of the bill of rights, made it so the people of this country could have the right to keep and bear arms. But in this regard, he is hardly the first. The winner-take-all approach in elections is unfair and undemocratic, as it does not necessarily present the majority view. This conflict of interest boils down to a matter of human nature. Its adoption in the United States also would help Americans get past their toxic debate over laws that would make it harder to vote. If we force everyone to vote, the electorate will become even more irrational and misinformed.